The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence
- Journal
- Andalas University Repository (Andalas University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w91340630 →Countries where authors are citing The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence
This map shows the geographic impact of The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence
This network shows the impact of The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence.
About The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Susan K. Grove, Nancy Burns and Jennifer Gray covering the research area of General Health Professions and Issues, ethics and legal aspects. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (464 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (249 citations) and Clinical Psychology (227 citations). Published in Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w91340630.