Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number

425 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1978, received 425 indexed citations. Written by Leonard Kleinrock and J.A. Silvester covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (408 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (214 citations) and Ocean Engineering (72 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w90875167 →

Countries where authors are citing Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w90875167.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026