Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.
- Authors
- Barbara M. Byrne
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w90866592 →Countries where authors are citing Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.
This map shows the geographic impact of Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.
This network shows the impact of Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process..
About Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.
This paper, published in 2008, received 627 indexed citations . Written by Barbara M. Byrne covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (276 citations), Clinical Psychology (190 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (133 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w90866592.