Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w90822327 →Countries where authors are citing Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia
This map shows the geographic impact of Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia
This network shows the impact of Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia.
About Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia
This paper, published in 1993, received 289 indexed citations . Written by Carol A. Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer covering the research area of Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (136 citations), Anthropology (120 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (95 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w90822327.