An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Mark VelasquezPatrick T. Hester
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w90696295 →Countries where authors are citing An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
This map shows the geographic impact of An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
This network shows the impact of An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods.
About An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
This paper, published in 2013, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Mark Velasquez and Patrick T. Hester covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (363 citations), Strategy and Management (162 citations), Building and Construction (109 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (96 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (93 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w90696295.