Sociology: Themes and Perspectives

592 indexed citations
published 2000
Journal
eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w903411 →

Countries where authors are citing Sociology: Themes and Perspectives

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sociology: Themes and Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sociology: Themes and Perspectives more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Sociology: Themes and Perspectives

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sociology: Themes and Perspectives.

About Sociology: Themes and Perspectives

This paper, published in 2000, received 592 indexed citations . Written by Robert van Krieken, Daphne Habibis, Philip L. Smith, Brett Hutchins and Michael Haralambos. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (280 citations), Education (186 citations) and General Health Professions (69 citations). Published in eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w903411.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026