Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters
- Authors
- Alberto Alesina
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9021345 →Countries where authors are citing Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters
This map shows the geographic impact of Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters
This network shows the impact of Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters.
About Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters
This paper, published in 1988, received 499 indexed citations . Written by Alberto Alesina covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (356 citations), Economics and Econometrics (346 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (81 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9021345.