Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals
- Authors
- J. Bussgang
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w90188715 →Countries where authors are citing Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals
This map shows the geographic impact of Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals
This network shows the impact of Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals.
About Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted gaussian signals
This paper, published in 1952, received 514 indexed citations . Written by J. Bussgang covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (318 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (98 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (93 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w90188715.