[Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France].
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w90175882 →Countries where authors are citing [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France].
This map shows the geographic impact of [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France].. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France]. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France]. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France].
This network shows the impact of [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France].. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France]..
About [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France].
This paper, published in 1985, received 565 indexed citations . Written by Bernard Bégaud, J C Evreux, J Jouglard and G Lagier. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (191 citations), Toxicology (177 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (93 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w90175882.