Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma
- Authors
- Ronnie Janoff‐Bulman
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89634911 →Countries where authors are citing Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma
This map shows the geographic impact of Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma
This network shows the impact of Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma.
About Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma
This paper, published in 1992, received 2.4k indexed citations . Written by Ronnie Janoff‐Bulman. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Social Psychology (618 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (598 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89634911.