Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses

321 indexed citations
published 2011

Countries where authors are citing Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses.

About Permission re-delegation: attacks and defenses

This paper, published in 2011, received 321 indexed citations . Written by Adrienne Porter Felt, Helen J. Wang, Alexander Moshchuk, Steven Hanna and Erika Chin covering the research area of Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Signal Processing (307 citations), Information Systems (187 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (168 citations). Published in USENIX Security Symposium.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8949641.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026