Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees

554 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 554 indexed citations. Written by Gilles Louppe, Louis Wehenkel, Antonio Sutera and Pierre Geurts covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (143 citations), Environmental Engineering (51 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (49 citations). Published in Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8946334 →

Countries where authors are citing Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8946334.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026