Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design

914 indexed citations
published 1990
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w89321418 →

Countries where authors are citing Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design.

About Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design

This paper, published in 1990, received 914 indexed citations . Written by F.H. Kulhawy and Paul W. Mayne covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (849 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (336 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (96 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w89321418.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026