Pros and cons of different sampling techniques
- Authors
- Gaganpreet Sharma
- Journal
- International journal of applied research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8931747 →Countries where authors are citing Pros and cons of different sampling techniques
This map shows the geographic impact of Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pros and cons of different sampling techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pros and cons of different sampling techniques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pros and cons of different sampling techniques
This network shows the impact of Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pros and cons of different sampling techniques.
About Pros and cons of different sampling techniques
This paper, published in 2017, received 513 indexed citations . Written by Gaganpreet Sharma. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (94 citations), Education (80 citations) and Strategy and Management (61 citations). Published in International journal of applied research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8931747.