Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Patrick W. CorriganAmy C. Watson
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w89219533 →Countries where authors are citing Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.
This map shows the geographic impact of Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.
This network shows the impact of Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness..
About Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.
This paper, published in 2002, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Patrick W. Corrigan and Amy C. Watson covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (627 citations), Clinical Psychology (504 citations), General Health Professions (228 citations), Sociology and Political Science (159 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (151 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w89219533.