Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

628 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 628 indexed citations. Written by Bo Zong, Song Qi, Martin Renqiang Min, Wei Cheng, Cristian Lumezanu, Dae-Ki Cho and Haifeng Chen covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (556 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (307 citations) and Signal Processing (189 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w89082998 →

Countries where authors are citing Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Deep Autoencoding Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w89082998.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026