Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation.
- Authors
- Arlene WeissmanAaron T. Beck
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88938953 →Countries where authors are citing Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation.
This map shows the geographic impact of Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation.
This network shows the impact of Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation..
About Development and Validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: A Preliminary Investigation.
This paper, published in 1978, received 570 indexed citations . Written by Arlene Weissman and Aaron T. Beck covering the research area of Speech and Hearing and Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (426 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (331 citations) and Social Psychology (157 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88938953.