Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design
Impact in
- Authors
- A. GelbWallace E. Vander Velde
- Journal
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88417699 →Countries where authors are citing Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design
This map shows the geographic impact of Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design
This network shows the impact of Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design.
About Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design
This paper, published in 1968, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by A. Gelb and Wallace E. Vander Velde. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Control and Systems Engineering (541 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (279 citations), Mechanical Engineering (156 citations), Biomedical Engineering (142 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (121 citations). Published in BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88417699.