Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts.

495 indexed citations
published 1972

Impact in

Classified as

Authors
P.J. Boyne
Journal
PubMed

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w88409737 →

Countries where authors are citing Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts..

About Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts.

This paper, published in 1972, received 495 indexed citations . Written by P.J. Boyne covering the research area of Genetics and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (471 citations), Molecular Biology (136 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (118 citations), Surgery (100 citations) and Oral Surgery (80 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w88409737.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact