Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi
- Authors
- Şerif Mardin
- Journal
- State University of New York Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8836901 →Countries where authors are citing Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi
This map shows the geographic impact of Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi
This network shows the impact of Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi.
About Religion and social change in modern Turkey : the case of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi
This paper, published in 1989, received 106 indexed citations . Written by Şerif Mardin covering the research area of Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (83 citations), Sociology and Political Science (73 citations) and Education (22 citations). Published in State University of New York Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8836901.