Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
- Authors
- Christopher W. Boyce
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88341095 →Countries where authors are citing Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
This map shows the geographic impact of Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
This network shows the impact of Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input..
About Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
This paper, published in 2006, received 505 indexed citations . Written by Christopher W. Boyce. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (134 citations), Education (84 citations) and General Health Professions (50 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88341095.