Participation: the New Tyranny?

3.1k indexed citations
published 2001
Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8811404 →

Countries where authors are citing Participation: the New Tyranny?

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Participation: the New Tyranny?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Participation: the New Tyranny? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Participation: the New Tyranny? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Participation: the New Tyranny?

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Participation: the New Tyranny?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Participation: the New Tyranny?.

About Participation: the New Tyranny?

This paper, published in 2001, received 3.1k indexed citations . Written by Bill Cooke and Uma Kothari covering the research area of General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (1.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (599 citations), Political Science and International Relations (532 citations), General Health Professions (404 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (297 citations). Published in Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8811404.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026