Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance

1.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally MacIntyre, Susan Michie, Irwin Nazareth and Mark Petticrew covering the research area of General Health Professions and Speech and Hearing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (684 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (336 citations) and Clinical Psychology (248 citations). Published in ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w88017852 →

Countries where authors are citing Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w88017852.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026