ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature
Impact in
- Hematology 603
Classified as
- Authors
- Felix Mitelman
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w87918141 →Countries where authors are citing ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature
This map shows the geographic impact of ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature
This network shows the impact of ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature.
About ISCN 1995 An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Felix Mitelman covering the research area of Genetics and Cancer Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Hematology (603 citations), Molecular Biology (448 citations), Genetics (388 citations), Genetics (307 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (265 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w87918141.