Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace.

659 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2001, received 659 indexed citations. Written by Stevan E. Hobfoll and Arie Shirom covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (431 citations), Social Psychology (270 citations) and General Health Professions (229 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w87883835 →

Countries where authors are citing Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w87883835.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026