Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Springer eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8778587 →Countries where authors are citing Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications
This network shows the impact of Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications.
About Fractional-order systems and control : fundamentals and applications
This paper, published in 2010, received 356 indexed citations . Written by Concepción A. Monje, YangQuan Chen, Blas M. Vinagre, Dingyü Xue and V. Feliú covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Control and Systems Engineering (279 citations), Modeling and Simulation (157 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (60 citations), Numerical Analysis (42 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (35 citations). Published in Springer eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8778587.