The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect
- Authors
- Bill KovachTom Rosenstiel
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w87697919 →Countries where authors are citing The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect
This map shows the geographic impact of The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect
This network shows the impact of The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect.
About The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect
This paper, published in 2001, received 968 indexed citations . Written by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Communication (713 citations), Sociology and Political Science (448 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (91 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w87697919.