The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up

457 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 457 indexed citations. Written by Thomas H. McGlashan, Barbara C. Walsh and Scott W. Woods covering the research area of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (378 citations), Clinical Psychology (151 citations) and Philosophy (148 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w87519183 →

Countries where authors are citing The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w87519183.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026