The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder

545 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 545 indexed citations. Written by Roger Bland, Glorisa Canino, Steven Greenwald, Hai‐Gwo Hwu, Stephen C. Newman, Mark Oakley‐Browne, M Rubio-Stipec, Priya Wickramaratne, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen and Eng‐Kung Yeh covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (517 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (200 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (195 citations). Published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8736072 →

Countries where authors are citing The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Cross National Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8736072.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026