Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations
- Authors
- Yoshimi KodamaAi Tomotaki
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8733265 →Countries where authors are citing Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations
This map shows the geographic impact of Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations
This network shows the impact of Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.
About Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations
This paper, published in 2020, received 418 indexed citations . Written by Yoshimi Kodama and Ai Tomotaki. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (139 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (132 citations) and Clinical Psychology (45 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8733265.