Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years
- Journal
- Elsevier eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8699419 →Countries where authors are citing Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years
This map shows the geographic impact of Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years
This network shows the impact of Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years.
About Theory and applications of computational chemistry : the first forty years
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Clifford E. Dykstra, Gernot Frenking, Kwang S. Kim and Gustavo E. Scuseria covering the research area of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (679 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (328 citations) and Organic Chemistry (314 citations). Published in Elsevier eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8699419.