Numerical methods used in atmospheric models
- Authors
- Fedor MesingerAkio Arakawa
- Journal
- Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86563412 →Countries where authors are citing Numerical methods used in atmospheric models
This map shows the geographic impact of Numerical methods used in atmospheric models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Numerical methods used in atmospheric models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Numerical methods used in atmospheric models more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Numerical methods used in atmospheric models
This network shows the impact of Numerical methods used in atmospheric models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Numerical methods used in atmospheric models.
About Numerical methods used in atmospheric models
This paper, published in 1976, received 527 indexed citations . Written by Fedor Mesinger and Akio Arakawa covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (340 citations), Oceanography (272 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (233 citations). Published in Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86563412.