An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Impact in
- Surgery 255
Classified as
- Authors
- Martin HertlSoper Nj
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86399300 →Countries where authors are citing An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
This map shows the geographic impact of An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
This network shows the impact of An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy..
About An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
This paper, published in 1995, received 586 indexed citations . Written by Martin Hertl and Soper Nj covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (425 citations), Surgery (255 citations), Oncology (60 citations), Emergency Medicine (33 citations) and Gastroenterology (4 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86399300.