Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997
- Authors
- Thomas E. Dahl
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86281125 →Countries where authors are citing Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997
This map shows the geographic impact of Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997
This network shows the impact of Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997.
About Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, 1986 to 1997
This paper, published in 2000, received 556 indexed citations . Written by Thomas E. Dahl covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry, Ecology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (405 citations), Global and Planetary Change (215 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (118 citations), Environmental Chemistry (78 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (75 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86281125.