Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields

254 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 254 indexed citations. Written by Dimiter M. Dimitrov covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (91 citations), Clinical Psychology (90 citations) and Education (59 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w86074491 →

Countries where authors are citing Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w86074491.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026