CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES

601 indexed citations
published 2002

Countries where authors are citing CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES more than expected).

Fields of papers citing CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES.

About CORROSION COST AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE UNITED STATES

This paper, published in 2002, received 601 indexed citations . Written by Gerhardus H. Koch, M.P.H. Brongers, N.G. Thompson, Y P Virmani and Joe H. Payer covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (347 citations), Materials Chemistry (297 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (109 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w85966921.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026