Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8590301 →Countries where authors are citing Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer.
This map shows the geographic impact of Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer.
This network shows the impact of Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer..
About Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer.
This paper, published in 2001, received 646 indexed citations . Written by Marylin J. Dodd, Christine Miaskowski and Steven M. Paul covering the research area of Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Otorhinolaryngology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (431 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (218 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (213 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8590301.