Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients.
Impact in
- Epidemiology 28
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85831217 →Countries where authors are citing Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients.
This map shows the geographic impact of Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients.
This network shows the impact of Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients..
About Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients.
This paper, published in 1991, received 501 indexed citations . Written by Crouch Ma and George Rb covering the research area of General Health Professions. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (336 citations), Epidemiology (28 citations), Health (28 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (27 citations) and Education (22 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85831217.