Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85668073 →Countries where authors are citing Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1.
This map shows the geographic impact of Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1.
This network shows the impact of Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1..
About Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1.
This paper, published in 2003, received 517 indexed citations . Written by Balaji Krishnamachary, Brian Kelly, Faton Agani, David M. Feldser, Glória C. Ferreira, Narayan V. Iyer, Jessica LaRusch, Brian J. Pak, Panthea Taghavi and Gregg L. Semenza covering the research area of Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cancer Research (396 citations), Molecular Biology (308 citations) and Oncology (121 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85668073.