Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85591634 →Countries where authors are citing Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.
This map shows the geographic impact of Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.
This network shows the impact of Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT..
About Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.
This paper, published in 1995, received 982 indexed citations . Written by Guido Germano, Hosen Kiat, Paul Kavanagh, Mady Moriel, M Mazzanti, Kenneth F. Van Train and Daniel S. Berman covering the research area of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (869 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (536 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (197 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85591634.