Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers

1.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 1.3k indexed citations. Written by covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (332 citations), Sociology and Political Science (294 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (197 citations). Published in Jimbun gakuhō.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8551922 →

Countries where authors are citing Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Qualitative Research Practice : A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8551922.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026