The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation
Impact in
- Urban Studies 315
Classified as
- Authors
- Tim HallPhil Hubbard
- Journal
- Wiley eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8536157 →Countries where authors are citing The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation
This map shows the geographic impact of The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation
This network shows the impact of The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation.
About The entrepreneurial city : geographies of politics, regime, and representation
This paper, published in 1998, received 498 indexed citations . Written by Tim Hall and Phil Hubbard covering the research area of Urban Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Urban Studies (315 citations), Sociology and Political Science (197 citations), Political Science and International Relations (107 citations), Finance (74 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (47 citations). Published in Wiley eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8536157.