Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases.
- Authors
- Ronald M. ReisnerJon R. Cohen
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85268247 →Countries where authors are citing Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases.
This map shows the geographic impact of Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases.
This network shows the impact of Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases..
About Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases.
This paper, published in 1994, received 423 indexed citations . Written by Ronald M. Reisner and Jon R. Cohen covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (413 citations), Surgery (399 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (37 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85268247.