Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering

676 indexed citations
published 1998
Journal
International Conference on Machine Learning

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8494775 →

Countries where authors are citing Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering.

About Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering

This paper, published in 1998, received 676 indexed citations . Written by Paul S. Bradley and Usama M. Fayyad covering the research area of Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (451 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (224 citations) and Signal Processing (209 citations). Published in International Conference on Machine Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8494775.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026