Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan
- Authors
- Matthew S. Hull
- Journal
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84868354 →Countries where authors are citing Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan
This map shows the geographic impact of Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan
This network shows the impact of Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan.
About Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan
This paper, published in 2012, received 183 indexed citations . Written by Matthew S. Hull covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (83 citations), Sociology and Political Science (79 citations) and Anthropology (56 citations). Published in Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84868354.