Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era

813 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 813 indexed citations. Written by Yoram Eshet‐Alkalai covering the research area of Computer Science Applications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (409 citations), Education (382 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (192 citations). Published in Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8471500 →

Countries where authors are citing Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8471500.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026