Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review

446 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 446 indexed citations. Written by Dongbin Xiu covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Civil and Structural Engineering and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (349 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (99 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (91 citations). Published in Communications in Computational Physics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8471046 →

Countries where authors are citing Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: A review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8471046.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026