Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium

585 indexed citations
published 1993
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w84600610 →

Countries where authors are citing Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium.

About Handbook of avian anatomy : nomina anatomica avium

This paper, published in 1993, received 585 indexed citations . Written by J Baumel and Nuttall Ornithological Club covering the research area of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Geometry and Topology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Paleontology (395 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (246 citations), Ecology (141 citations), Urology (63 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (52 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w84600610.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact