SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Impact in
- Oncology 3.3k
- Journal
- ScholarWorks - Georgia State University (Georgia State University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84480381 →Countries where authors are citing SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
This map shows the geographic impact of SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
This network shows the impact of SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003.
About SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
This paper, published in 2006, received 7.7k indexed citations . Written by Lynn A. G. Ries, Martin Krapcho, Angela B. Mariotto, B. Miller, Eric J. Feuer, Limin X. Clegg, Milton P. Eisner, Marie‐Josèphe Horner, Nadia Howlader and Matt Hayat. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (3.3k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.9k citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations), Surgery (1.2k citations) and Cancer Research (956 citations). Published in ScholarWorks - Georgia State University (Georgia State University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84480381.