The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
Impact in
- Geophysics 355
Classified as
- Authors
- M. Rider
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84214627 →Countries where authors are citing The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
This map shows the geographic impact of The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
This network shows the impact of The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs.
About The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
This paper, published in 1986, received 795 indexed citations . Written by M. Rider covering the research area of Geochemistry and Petrology, Ocean Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (397 citations), Geophysics (355 citations), Mechanical Engineering (282 citations), Ocean Engineering (228 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (179 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84214627.